Sunday, May 26, 2013

DNA Super Chip - Read a man in an hour, at the molecular level!!!??





DNA SUPER SCIENCE CHIP
Panasonic’s New DNA Chip, can sequence one person’s DNA in one hour.


DNA Super Science DNA sequencing will now take off at exponential rates with the new Panasonic breakthrough card sized, DNA chip, DNA reader!

DNA CHIP

The Panasonic DNA chip can sequence one adult humans DNA in one hour in 2013, when in 2014 (or likely much sooner) we will know how to read and understand so much more of what this sequencing means.
It’s all in the sequencing. The arrangement of genes in a coded pattern that looks like
AAGTGGACC
DNA sequencing is the process of determining the precise order of nucleotides within a DNA molecule. It includes any method or technology that is used to determine the order of the four bases—adenine, guanine, cytosine, and thymine—in a strand of DNA.
We now know that the epigenentic material that surrounds the gene acts as a control switchboard turn genes on and off.
I would say things are on schedule for a rapid shift in human intelligence, human understanding and human life altogether. The human potential that will be unlocked by these new molecular understandings of us, will result nothing short of earth changing.

THEORY IN HUMAN POTENTIAL WITH THE NEW DNA CHIP ° Does the chip tell all?

We can already feel it’s time for many ways of the old to just go away. What once had it’s reign in humanity for a time, will now be puzzles to play with in the future. Who lied, who stole, who alienated their children from the parent, who traded sub- prime lending derivatives (See the Matt Damon narrated Inside Job), in full knowledge or in part koweldge is all possily going to be readable in DNA coding. A very advanced computer-like data network that stretch out to the sun and back 300 times over. A coding and storage capacity that we will likely not fill up in this lifetime.
Can you get a Panasonic chip reading that will tell you if your on the road to cancer?  This is for sure. For many cancers right now, doctors understand enough about cancer and pre-cancer signs to most cancers to detect probabilities in your DNA.

GOOD = SELFLESS = RIGHTEOUS = ATTGGCC & BAD = SELFISH = EVIL = GGCCAA

Who did all these petty little selfish self serving things, and those who served God, others, the earth, the light and they’re children honestly; will be inherently separated. Behaviors, choices, thoughts, and knowledge that a person makes, all come together and show specific activities spread through the DNA System that works with the brain. Once we can read and understand this activity and the changes made in the DNA System we will virtually be able to see right through a person, without having to get any street experience. It will be like a calculator for life, you don’t need to know how to detect or solve complicated decisions or problems, you will be able so sort of get what’s going on by an intense decoding of this complicated activity. Oh this person is scamming, or this person honestly feels he is selling a good product will be some of the most easy calculations for life’s calculator.
DNA SUPER SCIENCE CHIP
Panasonic’s New DNA Chip, can sequence one person’s DNA in one hour.

Not as much of a theory as you may think!?

No! These crazy things you say can’t be backed up by any real science! You must be a religious fanatic or you like to write interesting day dreams! You will be shocked to learn that this is now backed up by real science. New DNA research from 2012 and 2013 shows that there is a DNA System much like the Nervous system that facilitates synchronistic activity with conscious decision making. This is particularly interesting because there is no physical movement or contact necessary in this system it is purely, conscious recognitions.  Do your homework, there is a lot of nutty stuff out there but this isn’t it, as nutty as it does sound.

Saturday, April 27, 2013

JUNK DNA DEBUNKED & REBUNKED & "RE-JUNKED?"- National Encode Findings Under Fire! Why?!

Huffington post: "Encode's sin was over-exaggerate the importance of Junk DNA." Is this Bill Frezza a geneticist? His title says "Fellow in Technology." What in the world is that? Strong attacks are being given to the productive and hopeful sciences of testing the other 80% of the human genome (DNA - our human molecular property) when the attackers are not really justifying this. Bill Frezza (and many other authors of these anti-new-research articles) rests on an article by Dan Graur in the Oxford Journals as a "must.read" which is really alot of what I would call grey area stuff with not a lot of founding. This short Journal article that sites no references quotes the following as some of Encodes transgressions.

(3) by failing to appreciate the crucial difference between “junk DNA” and “garbage DNA,” (4) by using analytical methods that yield biased errors and inflate estimates of functionality, (5) by favoring statistical sensitivity over specificity, and (6) by emphasizing statistical significance rather than the magnitude of the effect. Here, we detail the many logical and methodological transgressions involved 

The Bill Frezza article goes on to say that Graur felt the New York Times article entitled
Bits of Mystery DNA, Far From ‘Junk,’ Play Crucial Role Published on September 5th 2012, was a misrepresentation of what was really going on in the media.  Bill more or less gets right into an accusation that too much money is being spent on something thats not producing sufficient results. That the group of more than 400 (I am sure there are plenty of molecular biologist looking at this now) scientists who have made their careers in science are "salivating" over new funds. Are all of these writers virtually protesting further science in human potential like, Bill Frezza? Suggesting a deeper look or a third party management plan of some of the scientific processes going on is one thing, but this sounds like, turning down "$400 million" in human biological testing, at a time when we are buying up all the ammunition to... further our human life? I am seeing to many slashes and moves to discredit Encode than I can find they deserve. Most of the science I have been looking at regarding this stuff is pretty well founded, solid-sounding, and scientific. I have been looking at so many slash pieces that it just seems off. We hear so much about disinformation in medical sciences already but who is calling anything out?

I mean is there really anything more important than this to humans?

One gram of DNA can hold 700 TB of computer data right now, with a 99% error free test result. Many feel that by unlocking the secrets of this long known Junk DNA we can cure diseases and live forever It starts to give light to the possibility of resurrection.

Let's not forget this research challenges the old time Godfathers of the big pharmaceutical industry and insurance industries. Is this where Junk DNA and the new 2012 wave of "Re-Junk DNA" is coming from? The bashing doesn't makes sense when you look at clear honest scientific statements on the other side of the fence such as from nature.com, "On the 60th anniversary of the double helix, we should admit that we don't fully understand how evolution works at the molecular level," says Encode Contributor Philip Ball.

Let's get the focus back onto the possibilities and real DNA investigation. I think what the new Encode research papers are really calling for is a whole bunch more funding. These new tests suggest that there is activity that corresponds with human behavior at the molecular level, that actually changes more "stationary-like" genome existences in a long term manner. More simply put and combines with the storage ability discussed above; this could mean that committing sin as well as acts of righteousness and everything in between are recorded in a new form of storage, quite possibly in some form of real genetic existence that creates reactions.

The DNA science world still says that the majority of DNA matter is yet to be fully understood. I guess we better get on it then!

I certainly cast my vote for lets do as much scientific research regarding 100% of DNA matter as possible and in so not to cut one thing out of the petri dish at the starting line.